To evaluate perhaps the math nervousness-overall performance connect would-be moderated by a selection of variables (elizabeth

To evaluate perhaps the math nervousness-overall performance connect would-be moderated by a selection of variables (elizabeth

g., geographical region, dimension from MA, aspect regarding math efficiency, intercourse, degree top, and you may publication seasons), we presented the fresh heterogeneity take to. This new Q sample (heterogeneity take to) are finding the difference certainly perception systems, thus to explore hence possible moderator (i.e., investigation has actually) have played a role on these distinctions are called for.

Geographical Part

Geographical nations was in fact believed a possible reasonable basis. The end result models was in fact labeled to the five wider organizations: Us, Europe, China and other counties. The brand new analytical heterogeneity one of many feeling products is shown (Q = , p = 0.01). Particularly, the studies that have Far-eastern products encountered the largest perception dimensions (r = ?0.41), since the studies having Eu examples exhibited the tiniest feeling proportions (r = ?0.21). Additionally, the research with our team examples got more substantial impression size (roentgen = ?0.30) versus related category for the Europe, while they got a smaller sized impact size versus related classification into the Asia.


The newest moderate analyses into intercourse was held thanks to a couple of methods. Earliest, the category on this subject adjustable try in keeping with Ma’s (1999) investigation, therefore compared perhaps the mathematics nervousness-overall performance hook up was notably various other among about three categories (male, women, and you can combined); the results suggested there had been no variations one of many around three groups (Q = 4.62, p = 0.099). Next, this research tended to extend further to check on when to prohibit the fresh mix up impact on the mixed group and you will whether or not the mediocre correlations ranging from men and women was indeed rather various other. Merely 7 education that given the relationship between MA and you will mathematics results otherwise necessary data would-be relocated to effect designs for different men and women was in fact incorporated. The outcomes ideal zero significant difference between female (r = ?0.30) and you may people (r = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).

Degree Height

Four level-height groups have been formed contained in this meta-study, and a simple classification, junior higher classification, elderly highest category, blend class, and you may university category. The outcome ideal this adjustable had high effects with the mathematics anxiety-overall performance link (Q = , p = 0.02). More especially, the new older large category had the largest mathematics stress-efficiency connect (r = ?0.44), followed closely by brand new junior highest class (roentgen = ?0.39), college or university (r = ?0.33), basic (r = ?0.27), and you can combined class, which had the smallest math anxiety-overall performance hook (r = ?0.21).

Book Years

The modern meta-data contained the time frame out of 19 years (2000–2018). To check on if or not date got an effect on the fresh mathematics anxiety-efficiency connect, a good Pearson correlation is actually presented within publication many years as well as the of all of the private studies (roentgen = 0.27, p > 0.05). No relationship is discover between impression systems and also the guide many years (Contour cuatro).

Aspect out of MA

I as well as browsed if the scales accustomed sample mathematics stress got an impact on the fresh math anxiety-show link. The results recommended that dimensions out-of MA didn’t come with feeling to the math nervousness-overall performance hook (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Specifically, individual education that used other balances (e.g., this new Math Anxiety Level to possess Elementary College or university Children [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] had the premier math nervousness-overall performance connect (roentgen = ?0.41), followed closely by degree that used the newest MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (roentgen = ?0.35), MAQ (roentgen = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (roentgen = ?0.24), and you may AMAS (roentgen = ?0.24), and you will individual studies which used the fresh MASC met with the tiniest math anxiety-show connect (roentgen = ?0.15).

Dimensions regarding Mathematics Efficiency

The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *